Vote NO on Newton Charter
  • About
  • News
  • Why Vote NO?
  • Who Voted NO?
  • Volunteer
  • Contact
Picture

Want to support the continued presence of ward-elected councilors in Newton City Government?
  Follow us on Twitter and ​Facebook.


On November 7th, 2017,  Newton Voters rejected a charter commission proposal to move to a 100% at-large city council.  

Picture

scope oF PROPOSED CHANGES

The Newton City Council currently has 24 members. Each of the eight wards has one ward-elected councilor (elected only by the ward to represent them and to be accountable to them), and two At-Large Councilors, elected city-wide. 

​The most significant change in the charter commission proposal is the  elimination of the city's eight ward-elected councilors and half of the at-large councilors.  It instead specifies twelve at-large Councilors elected by all voters city-wide: one residing in each ward plus four residing anywhere in the city.

The charter commissions report can be viewed here.  Note this report is an advocacy piece and not an objective summary of the proposed changes or associated data. 

why are the proposed charter changes bad?

CONCENTRATED POLITICAL POWER
Currently, membership on the City Council is allocated evenly throughout the city, divided between councilors elected city-wide, and those elected solely by each ward. This allows for diverse voices to be heard from across the city.  Under the proposal, five of twelve councilors could be elected from just one small section of Newton, disenfranchising residents in the remaining wards from equal representation.
​

​Experience from other communities shows that in such a scheme, councilors tend to be less socioeconomically diverse and clustered in one part of a city. Why would we move to a system in which five out of twelve councilors could all come from the same ward, rather than our current system, in which each ward has an equal number of City Councilors. 
Picture

REDUCES ACCOUNTABILITY AND REPRESENTATION; WEakened Constituent ServicE

The proposal eliminates the 8 ward-elected councilors who provide us with village-level constituent service and advocacy.  This is not a system that retains ward representation.  If this change passes, no ward will have a councilor directly focused on, and accountable to, its residents.   

​​By eliminating the Ward Councilor, we would be removing the councilors many citizens know best, as they are often the first stop for help with traffic safety concerns, sidewalk repair, or to remind City Hall about an unfulfilled 311 request. The Ward Councilor is accountable to local voters, because if he or she isn’t responsive, the ward can vote him or her out. But with a citywide seat, a councilor can be unresponsive to the ward, even lose the ward vote, but still easily win re-election, simply because the city is so big. 

Increased influence of special interests

​The Charter Commission proposal makes it easier for special interests to influence our City Council. Under our current system, Councilors, especially Ward Councilors, cannot ignore their constituents. In the case of large development projects, for example, Ward Councilors ensure the concerns of those most affected are carefully considered and development projects are often significantly improved with neighborhood feedback. ​   The 4 pick-4 seats are intended, according to the commissioners, to be oriented to special interests.

LIMITS TO New Candidates

When candidates run within the ward, they can meet most of the people that live in the ward, and run and win with limited means. In contrast, citywide races are expensive and time-consuming.  If all candidates are forced to run at-large, for half as many seats, only candidates with wealth or political machines will tend to join the council.  ​
Picture

update: A Better way to reduce council size: 8 Ward, 8 At-Large

​In October, a majority of the City Council voted to seek a home rule petition to reduce the City Council to sixteen Councilors: eight ward-elected and eight At-Large. ​This Plan only moves forward if the Charter Commission proposal is voted down on November
Watch a four-minute summary of flaws in proposed charter from Newtonville Ward Councilor Emily Norton. Note this was recorded before the 9-member Charter Commission reduced the proposed council to 12 to minimize votes required for Special Permit approval:

Councilor Norton Comments on Newton Charter Review from NewTV on Vimeo.

Watch Jack Prior and Duney Roberts debate proposed Charter with Ken Parker on NewTV Common Ground
More Info
Follow NewtonDemocracy on Facebook
Follow @newtondemocracy on Twitter:
Tweets by newtondemocracy
Picture

want to learn more?

Subscribe to our email newsletter and follow us on Facebook and Twitter to stay up to date on the latest efforts to stand up for local democracy and defeat the charter proposal! 

Contact us

Questions? Concerns? Want to connect with us?   Send an email to info@newtondemocracy.org.
Picture
Picture

Mailing Address

Newton Citizens for Local Representation
​PO Box 600540
​Newton, MA 02460

Email

info@newtondemocracy.org
  • About
  • News
  • Why Vote NO?
  • Who Voted NO?
  • Volunteer
  • Contact